WELCOME TO
|
|
|
|
ESD DISSIPATIVE AIR TUBING
BENEFITS
-Permanent Static Dissipative
-Insensitive to environment
-Special design for cleanroom application
APPLICATIONS
-Disc Drive industries(MR & GMR Head)
-Semi – Conductor industries
-Areo - Space industries
STOCK AVAILABILITY (FOR AIR)
|
Inner Diameter |
Outer Diameter |
Standard Roll |
Part No. |
|
1/16 |
1/8 |
100 |
ESD TU 016/ 018 |
|
1/8 |
1/4 |
100 |
ESD TU 018/ 014 |
|
1/4 |
3/8 |
100 |
ESD TU 014/ 038 |
|
3/8 |
1/2 |
50 |
ESD TU 038/ 012 |
|
3/8 |
5/8 |
50 |
ESD TU 038/ 058 |
STOCK AVAILABILITY (FOR AIR)
|
Inner Diameter (mm) |
Outer Diameter(mm) |
Standard Roll (Meter) |
Part No. |
|
1.5 |
3.0 |
100 |
ESD 015 / 030 |
|
2.0 |
4.0 |
100 |
ESD 020 / 040 |
|
2.5 |
4.0 |
100 |
ESD 025 / 040 |
|
3.0 |
5.0 |
100 |
ESD 030 / 050 |
|
4.0 |
6.0 |
100 |
ESD 040 / 060 |
|
5.0 |
8.0 |
100 |
ESD 050 / 080 |
|
6.5 |
10.0 |
100 |
ESD 065 / 100 |
|
8.0 |
12.0 |
50 |
ESD 080 / 120 |
|
9.5 |
12.7 |
50 |
ESD 095 / 127 |
SPECIFICATION
|
Surface
Resistivity |
8 * 10 to power of 8 |
|
Decay time at
centre of tube |
0.5 to 1.2 seconds |
|
Decay time at end
of tube |
0.8 to 1.3 seconds |
|
Float voltage observed |
0V to 3 V |
|
Peel off voltage
observed |
0V to 3 V |
|
The tubing are free
from silicon |
|
PROCEDURES:
|
OUTGASSING – Three samples of tubing were used and placed in an outgassing vessel at 85 Degree C. It was then flushed continually for three hours at 50ml/min with grade 5 nitrogen. A carbotrap ‘B’ / carbotrap ‘C’ tube were then used to trap the outgassing constituents after which analyzing using GC/MS with ATD. FTIR / SILICONE OIL / HYDROCARBONS – The presence of silicone oil and hydrocarbons were extracted in solvent soluble residue from one piece of 15.5 “ of ESD Bluish Air Tubing. Both the inner and outer surfaces, a total of 121cm square, were rinsed with 10ml of hexane and isopropanol by mixing a portion of 1 : 1 (v/v) of the solvent solution. A clean 30ml glass beaker was used to collect the rinsate. The solvent solution was evaporated to dryness. Thereafter, FTIR / HATR was used to analyze for the presence of silicone oil and hydrocarbons on any residue rinsed from the sample. IONIC CONTAMINATION – A ESD Bluish Air Tubing sample were divided into three sections to test for ionic contamination. Three pre-clean glass beaker containing 10ml of de-ionized water was given one section of the tubing sample each and then capped off to prevent evaporation. The glass beakers were then placed in an 80 Degree C oven. The water extract was then analyzed using ion chromatography. A hand measured apparent surface area of 10.2cm square was used to calculate the results. |
RESULTS:
OUTGASSING – Below are the data obtained from using the following chemical
|
COMPOUND
INDENTIFICATION |
Section 1 Sample |
Section 2 Sample |
Section 3 Sample |
Average |
|
BHT |
10 ug/g |
13 ug/g |
11 ug/g |
11 ug/g |
|
KETONES |
26 ug/g |
23 ug/g |
24 ug/g |
24 ug/g |
|
SILOXANE |
1 ug/g |
0 ug/g |
0 ug/g |
1 ug/g |
|
HYDROCARBON, OTHERS |
15 ug/g |
12 ug/g |
17 ug/g |
15 ug/g |
|
TOTAL |
52 ug/g |
48 ug/g |
52 ug/g |
51 ug/g |
FTIR / SILICONE OIL / HYDROCARBONS
– Below shown was obtain from the analyzed results on one section of the tubing.
|
|
Section 1 Sample |
Limits |
|
SILICONE OIL |
10 |
As per customer’s specification |
|
HYDROCARBONS |
160 |
As per customer’s specification |
Note: Results for both the silicone oil and hydrocarbons are in nanograms/cm square surface area.
IONIC CONTAMINATION – The results tested as follows
|
SAMPLE |
Section 1 Sample
(ug/cm square) |
Section 2 Sample |
Section 3 Sample |
Average |
Limits |
|
AMMONIUM |
0.014 |
0.014 |
0.019 |
0.016 |
As per customer’s specification |
|
BROMIDE |
0.008 |
0.008 |
0.004 |
0.007 |
|
|
CALCIUM |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.019 |
0.020 |
|
|
CHLORIDE |
0.007 |
0.010 |
0.014 |
0.010 |
|
|
FLUORIDE |
0.031 |
0.028 |
0.030 |
0.030 |
|
|
MAGNESIUM |
0.001 |
0.000 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
|
NITRATE |
0.003 |
0.002 |
0.004 |
0.003 |
|
|
NITRITE |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
PHOSPHATE |
0.075 |
0.069 |
0.071 |
0.072 |
|
|
POTASSIUM |
0.011 |
0.012 |
0.011 |
0.011 |
|
|
SODIUM |
0.155 |
0.150 |
0.147 |
0.151 |
|
|
SULFATE |
0.000 |
0.003 |
0.000 |
0.001 |
|
|
TOTAL SUM OF ANIONS |
0.325 |
0.316 |
0.320 |
0.322 |
ROHS FOR AIR TUBING
On analysis, the following result were obtain:-
|
Test Parameter |
Digestion/
Extraction Method |
Analysis Method |
Result, ppm(w/w) |
|
Mercury (Hg) |
AC/RoHS/0010 Ver1.1/05 Wet Acid Digestion (Microwave) |
CVAAS |
ND |
|
Lead (Pb) |
AC/RoHS/0007 Ver1.0/05 Dry Ashing |
ICP-AES |
ND |
|
Cadmium (Cd) |
AC/RoHS/0007 Ver1.1/05 Wet Acid Digestion (Microwave) |
ICP-AES |
ND |
|
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) |
Ac/RoHS/0011 Ver1.0/05 EPA 3060A / 7196A (Modified) |
ND |
|
|
Polybrominated Biphenyls (PBB) |
AC/RoHS/0012 Ver1.1/05 (Microwave) |
GC-MS |
ND |
|
Plybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) |
AC/RoHS/0012 Ver1.1/05 (Microwave) |
GC-MS |
ND |
Remarks:
|
1)Sample was prepared as in AC/ROHS/0006 Ver1.0/05 and all the methods listed above are reference to the IEC 111/24/CD/Ed.1- Procedure for determination of levels of regulated Substances in Electrotechnical Products. 2)CVAAS = Cold Vapour Atomic Absorption Spectrometry ICP – AES = Inductively- Coupled Plasma – Atomic Emission Spectrometry GC-MS = Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry 3)The Method detection limits(MDL) for Lead, Cadmium, Polybrominated Biphenyls and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers = 1 ppm each 4)The Method detection limits(MDL) for Hexavalent Chromium = 2ppm 5)The Method detection limits(MDL) for Mercury = 0.5ppm 6)“ND” = Not detected (Less than or equal to 5ppm) |
Copyright © 2006 ESD
MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY. All rights reserved